A little help here please…
Logoworks is designing a logo for us and we have 6 design concepts to choose from as well as two “extra compositions”. Here they are.
Logo #1
Logo# 2
Logo #3
Logo #4
Logo #5
Logo #6
Extra Composition #1
Extra Composition #2
Please comment with your favorite logo. If you have color suggestions let us know. We can do several rounds of revisions with this group. They did a great job on the logo for Maya Jade. I’m not as excited (yet) with the logo for Super Affiliate Marketing.
on Jan 17th, 2007 at 12:31 pm
My Favorites are logo # 3 and Composition #1. The colors and the logos are simple and attention grabbing.
on Jan 17th, 2007 at 1:45 pm
I’m not as thrilled about these logo concepts as compared to last time we used logoworks - but I guess we need to be good about specifying what we like and don’t to get the most out of our revisions. That being said I like extra composition number 1 although not necessarily the colors it uses and the image is a little overpowering.
on Jan 17th, 2007 at 1:56 pm
I like #3 in that it is fairly simple. I’d like to see some different more 2.0 fonts and colors. I’d like something with the feel of the logos here. The retro bubbles on #6 are kind of cool, although I think I’d lose the cylinder thing and the SAM title.
on Jan 17th, 2007 at 4:40 pm
I like #3 and #5. #5 is probably my favorite. Its very clean, and the arc suggests, to me, a movement upwards to bigger and better things. However, I I think that the color needs to be changed. #3 is my second choice. Its also clean and simple. The icon could suggest making connections on the web or something like that. Like #5 I think I would like to see some other color options
on Jan 17th, 2007 at 4:55 pm
I’d say #1, #7 then #3. 1 & 7 have graphic elements that seem a bit oversized, but scale them down a bit and I think it’s great.
#3 could be cool if it was tweaked slightly so the graphic and text are a bit more cohesive.
on Jan 17th, 2007 at 5:01 pm
I actually like “Extra Composition #1″.
I like the concept of a target (targeting your marketing) and I like the “clean” feel to it.
FWIW.
Dave
on Jan 17th, 2007 at 5:36 pm
I like #5 best. Don’t love the color, but the font looks good and the arch thingy is pretty cool. I also like #3, although the little icon doesn’t really do it for me on I like the font.
on Jan 17th, 2007 at 9:07 pm
some more feedback that i got…
I like the extra composition #1. Not crazy about the colors, but I do like the simplicity of it. I kind of like logo #3 as well, although it seems giant compared to some of the others. (seems to have a message of helping people get from point a to point c) #1 seems too techno, the font on two is 80s tech font, 4-6 I just don’t like at all, and extra composition 2, while nice, seems fairly random.
and another…
My vote is logo #1 BUT with different colors. Orange and blue feel high-schoolish but I don’t know the industry that well enough, if people you are targeting will respond to that. It just shouts too much for me. Here are my other thoughts:
#2 is hard to read.
#3 type doesn’t feel together.
#4 is yuck. SAM?
#5 looks like a haircutting logo. Supercuts?
#6 is yuck again. That is not a logo. Aquarium?
Extra composition #1 is actually okay but the logomark is way too big. Colors again are an issue to me.
Extra composition #2 is what? I don’t get it.
on Jan 25th, 2007 at 2:41 pm
[…] We are still in the process of choosing a logo. Logoworks has been very good to work with and they’ve come back with these revisions: […]